Does Shrek have a Transexual Agenda?

All Credit to Bgay.com

The conservative Illinois Review blog posted a review of Shrek the Third, giving it a thumbs down because they felt that the mannish character of Doris the Ugly Stepsister, voiced by CNN's Larry King, is the byproduct of the Hollywood propaganda machine aimed at luring America's youth towards the evils of transgenderism (Defamer):

"Shrek's not the problem. It's the awkward inclusion of a transvestite and the uselessness of the character himself (herself?) in the story that is troubling. Right in the midst of a warm "traditional family" setting, the film writers place a man dressed as a woman in with Sleeping Beauty, Cinderella, Snow White (the good gals). The crossdressing character simply doesn't make sense, except as a ploy to desensitize children and parents to transgenders.""Homosexual activists now are careful to not only use the term 'LGBTs' as a unit, they are more boldly now declaring lesbians-gays-bisexuals-transgenders as a unit pushing together as one for civil rights. Those confused about their sexual roles are pushing for equal rights to be free to publicly demonstrate their odd sexual behavior. For transgenders, appearing to be a different sex in public is their particular turn on. We need to understand that acceptance of this sexual behavior is just another step moving our world toward sexual chaos."

Like, what the hell is this world coming to when we have to overanalyze a child's movie in order to support bigotry and hatred? Because she has a man's voice, she's a transexual? How so? They're just trying to "improve" her ugliness through having a deeper voice. Is that wrong? Even if she was trans, what does that mean? How many kids are thinking about that while watching Shrek? I wouldn't have even noticed! What will the right-wing come up with next?